← Back to Devil's Money Dashboard

Devil's Doc

Technical Specifications & Empirical Failure Writing Methodology for Silver (SLV)

1. The Premise: Why Empirical Failure Probability?

Standard options writing strategies typically select strikes based on standard Black-Scholes Delta (\Delta_{BS}). While mathematically clean, the Black-Scholes model relies on the assumption of a symmetric, continuous log-normal random walk (Geometric Brownian Motion).

In reality, financial markets exhibit extreme skewness, fat tails, volatility clustering, and strong momentum characteristics. By taking a purely theoretical Delta as a probability of failure, standard strategies over-expose themselves to risk during high-conviction momentum phases or relative valuation extremes.

The **Empirical Failure Probability Model** resolves this vulnerability. It applies a **3-Layer Adjustment Filter** to the raw Black-Scholes Delta to generate an **Adjusted Failure Probability** (P_{fail}). Options are strictly written only at strikes where P_{fail} < 10\%, optimizing the premium-to-risk ratio.

2. Mathematical Flow & Adjustments

The transition from standard theoretical Delta (\Delta_{BS}) to the final Adjusted Failure Probability (P_{fail}) is computed sequentially across three specialized analytical layers:

1. Raw Baseline Delta
BS formula output: \Delta_{BS}
2. Technical & Empirical Lifts
Historical 10-Yr SLV Performance
3. Gold/Silver Ratio Discount
Relative metal undervaluation
4. Macro Guardrail Penalties
Bond yields & Dollar Index trend
5. Adjusted Failure Probability
Final P_{fail} (< 10% Required)

Layer 1: Empirical Probability Lifts & 2-Candle Confirmation Window

When the **Triple-Filter Momentum Reversal Tracker** triggers an initial trend crossover (Day 0), the system initiates a **2-candle confirmation window** before execution is authorized. To confirm a real structural momentum shift and prevent false breakouts (wicks or shadows poking through the line), the daily/weekly candle body must clear the 9 EMA line on either Day 1 or Day 2 following the trigger:

Once confirmed, the system looks up the empirical performance shifts from a 10-year historical database of the SLV Trust. Lifts (L) represent how much the actual distribution of Silver price returns deviated from log-normal expectations over the closest matching DTE horizon (5, 10, 15, or 20 days).

Let \Delta_{BS} be the raw Black-Scholes delta of the call, and |\Delta_{BS}| represent the absolute delta of the put. The intermediate raw probability (raw) is calculated as:

Calls (Covered Calls):
Bullish Trigger Active: raw = \Delta_{BS} \times (1.0 + L_{bull})
Bearish Trigger Active: raw = \Delta_{BS} \times (1.0 - L_{bear})
Puts (Cash-Secured Puts):
Bullish Trigger Active: raw = |\Delta_{BS}| \times (1.0 - L_{bull})
Bearish Trigger Active: raw = |\Delta_{BS}| \times (1.0 + L_{bear})

Layer 2: Gold/Silver Ratio (GSR) Valuation Discounts

Silver and Gold are highly correlated precious metals. When their pricing ratio departs from historical averages, it creates structural gravitational pull:

Layer 3: Macro Guardrails (DXY & TNX Trends)

Precious metals are highly sensitive to the US Dollar Index (DXY) and 10-Year Bond Yields (TNX). Upward trends in the US dollar or bond yields drain liquidity away from commodity assets, drastically elevating the risk of sudden downward corrections in Silver.

If either the **DXY** or **TNX** closing price sits above its respective 9-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a macro headwind is active. This adds an absolute risk penalty of 2% (+0.02) directly to the failure probability of written **Puts**:

Put Failure Probability: P_{fail} = raw + 0.02
If no macro headwinds are active: P_{fail} = raw

3. Variable Multiplier Summary Matrix

The table below outlines how each individual secondary variable affects the overall writing recommendations:

Variable Condition Effect on Call Failure (P_{fail}) Effect on Put Failure (P_{fail}) Risk Rationalization
Bullish Technical Filter SMA200 & EMA9 cross-up + TD Buy count active Increases Risk
\times (1 + L_{bull})
Decreases Risk
\times (1 - L_{bull})
Strong technical breakout. Upside call risk rises; downside put risk is shielded.
Bearish Technical Filter SMA200 & EMA9 cross-down + TD Sell count active Decreases Risk
\times (1 - L_{bear})
Increases Risk
\times (1 + L_{bear})
Downward trend confirmed. Upside call risk drops; downside put risk is amplified.
GSR Cheapness Gold/Silver Ratio > 85.0 Neutral Decreases Risk
\times 0.99
Silver is structurally cheap relative to gold; strong fundamental tailwind protects downside.
GSR Richness Gold/Silver Ratio < 65.0 Decreases Risk
\times 0.99
Neutral Silver is structurally expensive relative to gold; upside momentum is fundamentally restricted.
DXY Uptrend US Dollar Index > 9-Day EMA Neutral Increases Risk
+ 0.02
Stronger greenback historically drains capital out of silver, elevating put risk.
TNX Uptrend 10-Yr Bond Yield > 9-Day EMA Neutral Increases Risk
+ 0.02
Rising yields represent higher opportunity cost for non-yielding metals, penalizing silver.

4. Option Execution Mechanics: Strike SD Shield & RVOL Ranking

To safeguard our asset base and optimize transaction routing, option executions in our trading pipeline are governed by two advanced quantitative constraints:

Standard Deviation (SD) Strike Selection Shield

When writing Covered Calls, the system prioritizes inventory preservation (preventing shares from being called away during volatile upside spikes) while maintaining yield targets. The minimum permissible strike price (K_{min}) is dynamically bound by the stock's cost basis (C_{basis}) plus one standard deviation (SD) calculated using option implied volatility (IV):

K_{min} = C_{basis} + \left( S_t \times IV \times \sqrt{\frac{DTE}{365.0}} \right)

Contracts must yield a premium of at least **$0.05** (to guarantee adequate yield on closer-dated tenors) while strictly satisfying Strike \ge K_{min}. To protect the portfolio from naked/margin call risk, active contracts are strictly bounded by uncovered inventory capacity:

Contracts_{max} = \lfloor \frac{Shares_{uncovered}}{100} \rfloor

Relative Volume (RVOL) Selection Bias

When the daily or weekly scanners trigger multiple candidate entry signals during the 3:30 PM EST market pulse, standard stock entries are restricted to a daily cap of 3 positions. Rather than using raw price proximity, the execution engine ranks candidates in descending order of **Relative Volume (RVOL)**. This filters out low-liquidity crossovers and executes trades strictly on setups backed by heavy institutional accumulation:

RVOL = \frac{\text{Volume}_t}{\text{SMA}_{20}(\text{Volume})}

5. Protective Guardrails: Squeeze Interventions

Beyond standard delta shift adjustments, the system incorporates an **Overall Gamma Squeeze Score** (ranging from 0\% to 100\%). Highly asymmetric options action (high call volume and high call open interest relative to puts) paired with intense spot breakout momentum can trigger severe squeeze conditions. Under these environments, mathematical adjustments are superseded by direct protective interventions: